Northeast Ohio Voter Advocates

Donate to NOVA Volunteer with NOVA Sign up for the NOVA newsletter

Our Reports

Lessons Learned From NOVA Volunteer Efforts to Improve Voter Registration, Vote by Mail and Turnout in 2016 (June 7, 2017)

At selected locations, NOVA volunteers increased turnout of youth and older citizen low-income voters, as well as of students at Cleveland State University (tentative data), by promoting voter registration and especially vote-by-mail, which we now recommend as an important option, especially for women (who used it preferentially). Combined registration and vote-by-mail at the Cuyahoga County jail also increased turnout.

Lessons Learned From NOVA Volunteer Efforts to Improve Voter Registration, Vote by Mail and Turnout in 2016 (June 7, 2017)

Two-page summary of full report (see above) with same title.

New Research from Cuyahoga County: Providing Vote-By-Mail Increased Turnout of Low-Income Voters in 2015 by about 25%  (Aug. 8, 2016)

Adding vote-by-mail encouragement and assistance in filing applications to voter registration campaigns could yield 20,000-40,000 additional votes from low-income people in Cuyahoga County in 2016 by increasing turnout. Vote-by-mail was greatly underutilized by this population in 2012.

Improving Registration and Voting in Ohio’s Low-Income Populations  (May 30, 2014)

Problems that reduce voting in low-income populations of Ohio, and practical suggestions to overcome them. Impact: Several of the report’s suggestions now being considered by Cuyahoga County. Others still need advocacy.

Ohio’s Rejection of Provisional Ballots in the 2012 vs 2008 General Election

Shows why Ohio rejects so many provisional ballots because of two main reasons (“not registered” and “wrong polling place”) and what can be done about it. Impact: Suggestions for advocacy.

Analysis of Early In-Person and Mail-In Absentee Voting in the Ohio 2012 General Election v. 2008 (Feb. 2013)

Demonstrated cross-state popularity of early in-person voting, as well as numbers that voted early in-person in last 3 days before election day 2012.  Showed waiting times for in-person voters on last weekend were much longer in larger urban counties of Ohio. Impact: Used in debate on preserving early in-person voting hours and in advocacy for expanded early in-person voting sites in large counties.

Does Ohio Have “Fair” and Sensible Rules for Early In-Person (EIP) Voting? (Sept. 27, 2012)

Elimination of the Last 3 Days of Early In-Person Voting in 2012 Could Affect about 97, 000 Voters Statewide (Sept. 27, 2012)

Do White, African American, and Hispanic/Latino EIP Voters Differ from Election Day and Vote by Mail Voters in Income? (Aug. 27, 2012)

Showed 97,000 Ohioans took advantage of last 3 days of in-person voting. Points out lack of proportion in establishing useful vs. “wasteful” early in-person voting hours. Impact: Widely cited in media, used in arguments against legislation and directives curtailing these days. Also considered by Ohio Elections Association.

Racial and Ethnic Proportions of Early In-Person Voters in Cuyahoga County, General Election 2008, and Implications for 2012 (July 2012)

Estimating the Number of Voters Without State ID (May 24, 2011)

Showed that some 940,000 adult Ohioans lack a driver’s license, not the 170,000 claimed by those advocating that driver’s license or state ID be required to vote. Impact: Helped defeat attempts to pass legislation absolutely requiring a driver’s license or state ID in order to vote.  Cited by Policy Matters Ohio paper on cost of voter ID laws.

 

Created at: